An electric motorcycle can be a working tool, a source of income and part of a cleaner transport system. Its environmental story continues after the vehicle stops running. A UNEP update published October 22 asks countries to consider that whole journey, including who can afford the technology and what happens to its batteries.

The update highlights two resources: a series on financing electric two- and three-wheelers and a technical report on end-of-life vehicle batteries launched in September. Its battery assessment projects that more than four million tonnes of used lithium-ion batteries could enter low- and middle-income countries, excluding China, inside imported electric cars by 2035. That is a future projection, not a measurement of waste already dumped.

The scale of the transition is visible in separate International Energy Agency data. The Global EV Outlook 2026 reports around 11 million electric two- and three-wheelers sold worldwide in 2025, with about one-tenth of the global fleet now electric. These figures describe vehicles in use and sales, not their recycling performance. Growth in one part of the system does not establish that the next part is ready.

UNEP identifies collection, tracking and producer-responsibility systems among the needed responses. It also emphasizes helping people working in informal recycling move into safer formal operations. An environmental transition that ignores those workers can transfer hazards rather than resolve them. The objective is a functioning chain of responsibility, not simply moving discarded materials away from the original owner.

UNEP’s separately published webinar guidance explains the concern: uncontrolled handling, burning, shredding or dumping can release hazardous substances into air, soil, water and food. Its November 26 session is planned for transport professionals without a chemicals background and will examine collection, reuse, recycling and occupational exposure. The event is upcoming; it has not yet delivered outcomes that can be assessed.

Affordability is another part of the same transition. UNEP’s October update describes how lending terms, risk-sharing and alternative ownership models could make vehicles more accessible to drivers. These are proposed approaches and context-dependent opportunities, not a promise that any particular rider will earn more or obtain affordable credit.

For citizens, community organizations and transport planners, constructive questions are available now. Who takes responsibility when a battery reaches the end of service? Is there an authorized collection route? How are workers protected, and can the material be traced? Those questions can inform procurement and policy discussions before a fleet expands.

Readers can share UNEP’s resources with local transport and waste authorities and check its official November webinar page for participation information. Businesses considering electric fleets can ask suppliers about documented end-of-life arrangements. This article does not offer instructions for handling or dismantling batteries, and a general environmental donation should not be assumed to finance a particular collection scheme.

Featured illustration: a 2024 schematic of a lithium-ion cell during charging and discharge. It is an explanatory drawing, not a photograph of recycling equipment or a current UNEP project. This article was prepared from published sources with AI assistance.

Ways to help

Sources

Produced with AI assistance for Humanitarian Explorer. Sources and image credits are provided on this page.